（新春走基层）电力“新兵”的元宵节：从“社会小白”到“电力守护者”******
中新网晋中2月3日电 题：电力“新兵”的元宵节：从“社会小白”到“电力守护者”
作者 高雨晴 张博然 冀一鸣
“小元，元宵节快到了，这时候千万不能松懈，咱们再进行一次特巡工作。”“好的，师父，马上就来。”临近元宵节，值长王时光带着刚入职的新员工元淑媛走进设备区，开展特巡工作。
从刚参加工作的大学生，到一名电力守护者，面对新环境、新群体、新挑战，元淑媛即将在国网山西超高压变电公司1000千伏特高压洪善站度过一个不一样的元宵节。自大年三十起，他们就一直坚守在工作岗位，至今已连续工作半个月。
1000千伏特高压洪善变电站位于山西省晋中市平遥县洪善镇北长寿村，于2017年8月14日正式投入运行。该站作为1000千伏榆横-晋中-潍坊特高压交流输变电工程的中间变电站，是华北特高压交直流主网架的重要组成部分，构成了“晋电外送”的重要通道之一。
往年元宵节，元淑媛都是和父母、朋友一起度过，“入职后第一年的元宵节就在站里度过，心里感到很期待”。
“工作十几年，在站里过节对我们来说已经习以为常了。”王时光指着眼前的设备说：“小元，你看看眼前的这些设备，想象我们同医生一样，在保电的关键阶段，对站内设备进行最后一次全面体检，好比家里的大扫除，做好保供专项巡查工作，是为了千家万户能够过上一个明亮温暖的幸福年。”
站长王亚文一如往常坚守岗位，在特巡班前会上，他介绍，目前正处于迎峰度冬和两节保电关键期，面对近期出现的雨雪天气，“我们已提前做好突发事件应急处置预案，开展相应的防寒、防冻、防风应急演练，保障电力主网在极寒天气下的安全稳定运行。”
于是，元淑媛和师父王时光拿着铁锹、铲雪车和扫帚走进站区，对前不久的大雪现场设备覆雪覆冰情况、GIS母线伸缩节以及室外箱柜加热驱潮等装置进行检查，并对500千伏一期、二期断路器水平布置盆式绝缘子法兰对接面的积雪进行清理。
手指头、脚趾头快被冻僵，呼出的热气形成小水珠挂在睫毛上，元淑媛心里感到十分困惑：“师父，等太阳出来雪慢慢化了就好了，为什么还要扫雪呢？”
“雪化了有可能顺着螺纹的缝隙破坏法兰的密封，造成漏气，严重了有可能对设备造成更大的伤害，还得停电处理，所以，能让大家在特殊时期放心用电，得靠我们每一个变电人认真负责去实现。”王时光语重心长地说。
为了保障节日期间可靠供电，洪善站启动防寒防冻特巡预案，加强站内设备的特殊巡视和红外测温的力度。同时组织运维人员对站内1000千伏主变、高抗进行“拉网式”隐患排查，对断路器加热器、保护小室、蓄电池室、消防泵房加热装置进行检查，密切关注气象变化，做好各项应急准备工作。
元宵佳节，元淑媛和站内值守的工作人员依旧会坚守岗位，紧盯监控大屏的报文信息，依次检查每台主变、高抗的油色谱在线的数据是否正确，照旧干着重复性的工作。
“作为一名青年员工，能在自己的岗位上发光发热，为守护万家灯火贡献属于自己的力量，让我倍感自豪。”元淑媛说。(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******
中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。
资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。
日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。
日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。
事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。
因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。
日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。
《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。
德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。
日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。
国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。
太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。
Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business
By John Lee
(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.
Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.
The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.
On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.
The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.
In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.
Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.
The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.
The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.
The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.
According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.
As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.
However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.
Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.
The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.
If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.
| 彩云网地图 |
